[1] If
Eddie’s the killer, then he planted the key at the murder scene if and only if
he used the key we found at his place. [2] But Eddie used the key we found at
his place only if the murder was committed on Tuesday—[3] and it wasn’t. [4]
Eddie’s the killer only if he was at the murder scene and planted a key there.
Therefore, Eddie’s not the killer.
Let: E = Eddie’s the killer
K = Eddie used the key we found at
his place
M = Eddie was at the murder scene
P = Eddie planted the key at the
murder scene
T = The murder was committed on
Tuesday
Represent
the argument and prove the conclusion.
Solution:
(1) E → (P ≡ K))
(2) (K → T)
(3) ~T
(4) E → (M
& P)
∴ ~E
(5) E Assumption
for RAA
(6) P
≡ K 1,
5 Modus Ponens
(7) M
& P 1, 4
Modus Ponens
(8) P 7
&-Elimination
(9) K 6, 8
≡-Elimination
(10) T 2, 9 Modus
Ponens
(11) T
& ~T 3, 10
&-Introduction
(12) ~E 5-11
RAA
No comments:
Post a Comment